Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Примечание: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
В начале мeлькают наши миномёты
Планы по возвращению к танковым дивизям к 2030 году.
Дивизии нового образца
Обновление на Battle Orderо 7 инженерных батальонах в дивизии прорыва
Some things that I got wrong in my initial December 2021 article due to the lack of public information (much more came out in 2022).
- The surveillance-marked company in the Division Cavalry is not a Long-Range Surveillance (LRS) capability as I speculated, but a "Cross Domain Troop" which is more technology-oriented.
- The Combined Arms Battalions, as envisioned in 2022, will not return to an equal 2 tank and 2 infantry company weighting like it was before 2016. This was an earlier proposal that didn't make it to Waypoint 2028. As of right now they retain their current configurations.
- The initial December 2021 graphics had odd symbols for the Division Sustainment Brigades. The DSBs have been much more fleshed out in the recent proposals and with the news on the redesign.
- The Division Artillery (DIVARTY) was initially labelled as an generic Artillery Brigade
Там же ссылка на интересный документОбновление на Battle Order
Future US Army Division Structures
8 April 2023: This article was originally published in January 2022 referencing late 2021 proposals and has been updated with early 2023 proposals. As the U.S. Army is refocusing on division-centric large scale combat operations (LSCO), it is planning on reviving the division as a proper...www.battleorder.org
Dems denounce GOP for not funding Pentagon’s multiyear munitions plan
House Democrats are criticizing Republicans for not funding the Pentagon's request for multiyear munitions buys, as endorsed by the China Committee.www.defensenews.com
Какие ГОПники молодцы - им можно, они же свои.
Кроме заголовка дальше читали ? Даже популярист арабских общечеловеков делает отступление
“The Committee is particularly concerned the Department [of Defense] cannot provide realistic cost estimates and has proceeded with these multiyear procurement requests without a firm understanding of each program’s unit cost and production capacity,” lawmakers wrote in their report.
Instead, the panel redirected money to bolster military training, maintenance and operations as well as Pentagon research and development efforts to field new technology and weapons.
...
The committee specifically denied multiyear procurement authority for Raytheon Technologies-manufactured Standard Missile-6 and the Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missiles because appropriators do not believe the Pentagon has a clear understanding of unit costs and production capacity.
...
The committee did greenlight multiyear procurement authority for the Naval Strike Missiles, Guided Multiple Launch Rocket Systems, Patriot Advanced Capability-3 Missile Segment Enhancements, Long Range Anti-Ship Missiles and Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missiles.
Appropriators explained that several missile programs “are worthy of multiyear procurement consideration due to their enduring importance and steady production” as justification for permitting bulk buys of these munitions.
Mk48?А что за пулемет у 8 и 10 бойцов?
m240А что за пулемет у 8 и 10 бойцов?